| WAC 230 |
Statutory
limitations on assessments. |
|
| SOURCE |
DOCUMENT |
DETER. NO |
DATE OF ISSUE |
DESCRIPTION |
| WAC: |
458-20-230 |
|
01/08/1993 |
Statutory limitations on
assessments.Effective 2/8/93 |
| RCW: | |
|
| |
82.32.050 |
|
1992 |
Deficient tax or penalty
payments-interest-Limitations. |
| |
82.32.100 |
|
1992 |
Failure to file returns or
provide records-Assessment of tax by department-Penalties and interest. |
| |
82.32.090 |
|
1996 |
Late payment--Disregard of
written instructions--Evasion--Penalties. |
| |
82.32.060 |
|
1997 |
Excess payment of tax, penalty,
or interest--Credit or refund--Payment of judgments for refund. |
| |
82.32.160 |
|
1989 |
Correction of
tax--Administrative procedure--Conference--Determination by department. |
| |
82.32.105 |
|
1996 |
Waiver or cancellation of
penalties or interest--Rules. |
| ETA: | |
|
|
| |
3042.2009 |
|
2/2/09 |
Statute of limitations not a defense when material fact misrepresented |
| |
156.32.230 |
|
8/19/66 |
STATUTE OF LIMITATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE Cancelled Effective 03/28/08. This document explains the application of the statute of limitations to amounts received in settlement between the contracting parties after completion of the project. WAC 458-20-197 (When tax liability arises) and 458-20-199 (Accounting methods) sufficiently address when income is to be reported for Washington tax purposes. |
| |
301.32.230 |
|
12/16/66 |
STATUE OF LIMITATIONS NOT A DEFENSE WHEN MATERIAL FACT MISREPRESENTED Revised 2/2/09 See ETA 3042.2009 |
| |
310.32.101.230 |
|
1/20/67 |
TAXPAYER HAS DUTY TO OBTAIN KNOWLEDGE OF TAX LIABILITY Cancelled 1/29/09. This ETA correctly states the principle that taxpayers have the responsibility to know their obligations. This matter is adequately addressed in Chapter 82.32A RCW (Taxpayer Rights and Responsibilities) and numerous publications of the Department. |
| INDUSTRY GUIDES: |
|
|
|
| SPECIAL
NOTICES: |
|
|
|
| DIRECTIVE: |
None |
|
|
|
| TAX TOPICS: | |
|
|
| RPM: |
None |
|
|
|
| WTD: |
2 WTD 325 |
87-66 |
|
EXCISE TAX -- INTEREST --
PENALTIES -- STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS -- UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER. The four-year
statute of limitations for the assessment of excise tax does not apply in
favor of a previously unregistered taxpayer Registration just prior to tax
assessment does not reactivate the statute of limitations. |
| |
2 WTD 325 |
87-66 |
|
EXCISE TAX -- INTEREST --
PENALTIES -- STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS -- UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER -- REGISTRATION
WITH OTHER AGENCIES -- ESTOPPEL. The four-year statute of limitations for the
assessment of excise tax does not apply in favor of a previously unregistered
taxpayer. The Department of Revenue is not estopped from assessing tax
outside the statute of limitations by virtue of the taxpayer's registration
with other state agencies or offices. |
| |
2 WTD 397 |
86-161A |
|
STATUTE OF LIMITATION'S -- TAX
REFUNDS -- CREDITS -- OFFSETS. There is no distinction at law between a
request for refund or credit of taxes overpaid and a request for offset or
adjustment of deficient taxes assessed for payment. All such requests are governed
by thestatute of limitations of RCW
82.32.060. |
| |
2 WTD 397 |
86-161A |
|
INVENTORY TAX CREDITS -- STATUTE
OF LIMITATIONS. The former provisions of RCW 82.04.442 (repealed in 1983) for
the taking of inventory tax credits were governed by the provisions of RCW
82.32.060 establishing the period of limitation for using such credits. |
| |
2 WTD 397 |
86-161A |
|
OFFSETS IN LIEU OF TAX CREDITS.
RCW 82.32.060 formerly provided for offsets in lieu of unused tax credits
against tax deficiencies discovered and assessed for period beyond the
statute of limitations, but was amended in 1979 to repeal such offset provisions. |
| |
2 WTD 453 |
87-104 |
|
B&O TAX -- CREDITS --
ADMINISTRATION OF -- DUTY TO INFORM. Although the Department attempted to
inform businesses of the B&O tax credits available under Chapter 82.62,
the Department has no discretion to grant credits to a business who failed to
make a timely application because it was unaware of the credits. |
| |
4 WTD 229 |
87-342 |
|
ASSESSMENT -- FOUR YEAR
NON-CLAIM PERIOD -- EXCEPTION -- UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER. An assessment of
taxes for a period more than four years after the close of the tax year
upheld where and out-of-state seller did not register as required by the
Revenue Act, even though the Department had previously advised the seller
that it did not need to register. Assessment upheld because Department's
earlier advice was based on the taxpayer's incorrect answer on the Business
Activities Statement about its activities in Washington. |
| |
5 WTD 107 |
88-37 |
|
B&O TAX -- STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS -- TIME OF IMPOSITION. The manufacturing tax is due when the
article has been manufactured. Thus, expenditures made before the audit
period and outside of the statute of limitations are includable in the
measure of the tax because the tax is imposed when the manufactured for
commercial use article is completed. |
| |
5 WTD 107 |
88-37 |
|
USE TAX -- STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS -- TIME OF IMPOSITION. The use tax on an article manufactured for
commercial use arises at the time the completed article is used, even though
some of the expenses were incurred and paid outside the four-year statute of limitations.
Credit against the tax will be allowed for actual sales or use tax paid. |
| |
5 WTD 107 |
88-37 |
|
RETAIL SALES TAX -- USE TAX --
EXEMPTION -- CERTIFICATE -- STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS -- MISREPRESENTATION. The
use, by Washington corporation, of an exemption certificate, claiming
exemption from tax on the purchase of a water vessel because it is a "non-resident
[purchasing] for use outside the state" is a misrepresentation of a
material fact sufficient to toll the statute of limitations and subject the
sale to deferred sales tax. |
| |
9 WTD 286-1 |
90-144 |
|
TAX ASSESSMENT -- TIME
LIMITATION -- UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER. While generally a tax assessment is
limited to a four year period, the time limitation does not apply to a
taxpayer who was not registered with the Department. |
| |
10 WTD 410 |
91-053 |
|
B&O TAX -- UBI --
UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER -- PERIOD OF LIMITATION. Taxpayer voluntarily
registered with some state agencies before the new Uniform Business
Identifier program was implemented. However, the taxpayer was not registered
with Department of Revenue and did not voluntarily file for an identification
number under the new UBI program. DOR discovered taxpayer's status through
the UBI system and assigned him a registration number. Because DOR discovered
the taxpayer was doing business in this state and was unregistered, he is
subject toa seven year period for tax
assessments rather than four years. |
| |
12 WTD 105 |
92-056 |
|
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
Assessment made timely when mailed to taxpayer's registered address within
statute of limitations regardless of taxpayer's claim that it was not
received. |
| |
12 WTD 553 |
93-004 |
|
B&O TAX -- UNREGISTERED
TAXPAYER -- PERIOD OF LIMITATION. Taxpayer was not registered with Department
of Revenue and did not voluntarily do so until after its presence in
Washington was discovered by the Department during an audit of an affiliate
conducting the same business in this state. The affiliate was also required
to register following discovery by the Department of its activity. Because
DOR discovered the taxpayer was doing business in this state and was
unregistered, it is subject to a seven-year period for tax assessments, plus
applicable penalties and interest, rather than the four-year period granted
to voluntary registrants. ACCORD: Det. No. 91-53,10WTD 410 (1991). |
| |
13 WTD 160 |
92-295 |
|
RETAIL SALES TAX -- NONCLAIM
PERIOD -- COLLECTED BUT NOT REMITTED. Under RCW 82.08.050 retail sales tax
collected is deemed to be held in trust until paid to the Department.
Therefore, a taxpayer is liable for all retail sales tax collected and not
remitted to the Department notwithstanding the nonclaim period in RCW
82.32.050. |
| |
13 WTD 203 |
BTA 41913 |
|
[1] STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS --
TRUST FUND EXCEPTION -- "IMPLIED EXCEPTION". Although the sales tax
trust fund statute, RCW 82.08.050, without more, does not automatically
create a de jure fourth
"implied exception" to the operation of the four-year statute of
limitations set forth in WAC 458-20-230, this conclusion does not imply that
the rule is in excess of statutory authority. To the extent that the rule
sets out the Department's position on sales tax trust funds it operates as
"fair warning" to sales tax trustees who might claim ignorance of
the consequences of their breach of trust. Under the BTA's construction of
RCW 82.32.050, "garden variety" failure to remit sales taxes
actually collected from a seller's customers would invariably toll the
statute of limitations. |
| |
13 WTD 203 |
BTA 41913 |
|
[2] STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS --
TRUST FUND EXCEPTION. Unexcused failure of a taxpayer to properly account for
and timely pay over sales tax funds collected from customers as a matter of
law tolls the statute of limitations until the Department discovers, or in
the exercise of reasonable diligence could have discovered, the sales tax
trustee's breach of duty. |
| |
13 WTD 203 |
BTA 41913 |
|
[3] STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS --
TRUST FUND EXCEPTION -- FRAUD OR MISREPRESENTATION -- ELEMENTS OF ACTIONAL
FRAUD V. INFERENCE. Fraud or misrepresentation may be inferred in the case of
unexcused failure of a trustee to disclose and pay over funds collected on
behalf of another. It is not necessary to demonstrate all the elements of
"actionable fraud" in order to fit within the definition of
"fraud or... misrepresentation of a material fact" in the case of a
trustee's unexcused clear breach of a fiduciary duty to account for a turn
over trust funds collected on behalf of another. |
| |
13 WTD 203 |
BTA 41913 |
|
[4] STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS --
TRUST FUND EXCEPTION -- FRAUD -- BURDEN OF PROOF. In order to bear the burden
of establishing by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence the existence of
fraud on the part of a taxpayer who has collected but not remitted sales
taxes, it is sufficient that theDepartment show fraud as a prima facie matter to which the taxpayer may submit evidence in rebuttal. |
| |
14 WTD 77 |
93-322 |
|
B&O TAX -- EXEMPTION --
MINIMUM TAXABLE AMOUNT -- "PERSON" DEFINED -- HUSBAND AND WIFE --
REGISTERED TAXPAYER -- UNREGISTERED TAXPAYER. Where one spouse has registered
and reported its taxes, that spouse is entitled to have its business treated
as a separate "person" provided the other spouse is not actively
involved in the registered spouse's business. In that case, the Department
will treat the unregistered spouse's activities as a separate business and
will assess tax up to seven years prior to the assessment date plus the
current year, and will impose penalties. However, where spouses operate
separate businesses and one spouse is registered and the other is not, the
Department cannot treat them as a single unregistered person for tax
assessmentpurposes. The Department
must be consistent in its treatment of taxpayers. |
| |
14 WTD 210 |
94-047 |
|
The scope of an audit is not
limited to the records initially provided by a taxpayer. Rather, the
Department is given this broad authority to review a taxpayer's books and
records in order to verify the accuracy of a return. Except for unregistered
taxpayers orupon a showing of fraud
or misrepresentation, the period of an assessment is limited to four years
after the close of the tax year. |
| |
17 WTD 36 |
93-287R |
|
MISCELLANEOUS -- UNPUBLISHED
DETERMINATIONS -- STARE DECISIS.Except for purposes of collateral estoppel in subsequent proceedings
involving the same taxpayer, unpublished determinations are not precedent,
may not be cited as such in proceedings before the Department, and do not
become part of the body of administrative law governing Departmental actions. |
| |
17 WTD 359 |
98-065 |
|
MOTION TO DISMISS; FAILURE TO
PROMPTLY CONSIDER PETITION -- WAIVER OF INTEREST.RCW 82.32.100 does not address the period
in which the Department must resolve a petition for correction of assessment.While RCW 82.32.160 does state that the
Department should “promptly consider the petition and may grant or deny it,”
it does not require that the assessment be waived simply because the
Department delayed in addressing the taxpayer’s petition.However, where the delay in issuing a
decision was for the sole convenience of the Department, the Department will
waive interest for the period commencing one year after the taxpayer filed
its petition through the payment due date. |
| |
18 WTD 93 |
98-144 |
|
EQUITABLE
ESTOPPEL:If the taxpayer previously
purchased a vehicle at retail, without paying retail sales tax, and
subsequently used it in Washington without paying a use tax, the auditor’s
failure to assess the tax was certainly an oversight.An omission of a tax in a previous audit
will not prevent the state from collecting the tax in subsequent audit. |
| |
18 WTD 110 |
98-117 |
|
EVASION PENALTY -- MOTOR
HOME.A husband and wife, who are
residents of Washington and who also live at their beach-front property in
Oregon several months a year, did not have the necessary intent to act in a
false or fraudulent manner to evade their Washington use tax and motor
vehicle excise tax obligations when they erroneously believed their motor
home needed to be registered solely in Oregon because that is where they used
it much of the time. |
| |
18 WTD 163 |
97-134R |
|
EVASION
PENALTY.Evidence of drug addiction
shows only the motivation for tax evasion, it is insufficient to overcome
proof that taxpayer knew taxes were due, collected but did not remit retail
sales tax trust funds, and under reported income. |
| |
18 WTD 188 |
97-192R |
|
REFUNDS -- STATUTES -- NONCLAIM
STATUTES.RCW 82.32.060 is a nonclaim
statute which is procedural in nature.Unless a taxpayer strictly complies with the terms of RCW 82.32.060,
the Department of Revenue cannot make any tax refunds. |
| |
19 WTD 101 (Part 1 of 2) |
98-039 |
|
RETAIL
SALES TAX – ASSESSMENT PERIOD –STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS – COLLECTED BUT
UNREMITTED SALES TAX – LAUNDRIES.In
general, the assessment period may be extended when retail sales tax is
collected and not remitted to the state.This tolling of the statute of limitations results from the fraud or
misrepresentation inferred from the unexcused failure of a taxpayer holding
trust funds to pay over such funds to the state.Such an inference is reasonable because
sales tax, with limited exception, is separately stated from the selling
price and collected from the buyer. |
| |
19 WTD 101 (Part 2 of 2) |
98-039 |
|
An exception occurs with respect
to sales tax levied on sales by coin-operated laundries, where sales tax is
not separately stated and collected from the buyer.Under such circumstances, the Department
must show by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the failure to remit
sales tax to the state was the result of fraud or misrepresentation before
the assessment period can be extended beyond four years after the close of
the tax period. |
| |
19 WTD 212 |
98-224 |
|
USE TAX -- LIMITATION FOR
ASSESSMENTS -- TIME AND PLACE OF SALE -- DELIVERY -- TITLE TRANSFER.Use tax was not due on the plate-making
machine originally sold and delivered in 1988 even though title did not
actually transfer until 1991. |
| |
19 WTD 367 |
99-239R |
|
USE TAX – CHARTER BOAT –
PERSONAL USE – STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.A charter boat put to personal or intervening use is subject to use
tax.It is only the first such use in
this state, however, that is taxable.If the statute of limitations runs on that first use, the Department
may not, thereafter, assert use tax on a subsequent use by the same person
during a period of continuous ownership. |
| |
20 WTD 410 |
01-005 |
|
EXCISE TAXES – CREDITING OR
COMPENSATING TAXPAYER FOR COSTS INCURRED.The Department cannot grant a credit, or otherwise compensate, a
taxpayer for out-of-pocket expenses the taxpayer incurs in connection with a
Department examination of the taxpayer’s books and records, or in connection
with appeals within the Department. |
| |
21 WTD 48 |
00-085 |
|
REVIEW
OF DEPARTMENTAL ACTIONS – ASSESSMENTS AND REFUNDS – EXHAUSTION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES.The review
procedures authorized by RCW 82.01.060(4), 82.32.160, 82.32.170, and Rule 100
may be used by taxpayers to review tax assessments and refund requests.However, there is no duty to exhaust
administrative remedies with regard to the Department’s review processes
before challenging the Department in a refund action under RCW
82.32.180. |
| |
21 WTD 48 |
00-085 |
|
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE --
ADMINISTRATION OF STATUTORY LAW -- PRESUMED CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
STATUTES.An administrative body does
not have the authority to determine the constitutionality of the law it
administers, but must presume the statute is constitutional. |
| |
22 WTD 131 |
02-002 |
|
B&O TAX – SALES TAX – USE
TAX – CREDIT ASSESSMENT – INCREASE ADJUSTMENT -- STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.A credit assessment will not be increased
from the amount originally credited for those years for which the statute of
limitations would have expired, unless a refund claim was filed or a waiver
executed prior to the expiration date.An assessment may be reduced after the expiration date, but not
increased. |
| |
23 WTD 13 |
02-0130 |
|
MISCELLANEOUS
-- B&O TAX -- EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL – ELEMENTS -- INACTION.Where DOR had originally contacted a
manufacturer three years earlier and notified it that it had nexus and was
required to register, DOR’s failure to issue a tax assessment at that time,
did not preclude DOR from making a current tax assessment for all years still
open under RCW 82.32.050. |
| |
23 WTD 257 |
01-198 |
|
VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT THAT
INCORRECTLY STATES DATE OF FIRST USE.Proof that first taxable use did not occur on the exact date stated in
the use tax assessment does not necessarily invalidate the assessment.An assessment of use tax is valid so long
as the evidence establishes a date of first use within the statute of
limitations. |
| |
23 WTD 331 |
04-0098 |
|
EVASION PENALTY.Evidence that the taxpayer knew he had a tax liability and knew he was
required to report and pay, but deliberately did not file tax returns because
he intended to defer payment of the taxes until his financial situation
improved, establishes intent to evade. |
| |
23 WTD 331 |
04-0098 |
|
EVASION
PENALTY.Even if a taxpayer intends to
evade payment of taxes only on a temporary basis, the taxpayer is subject to
the evasion penalty. |
| |
23 WTD 331 |
04-0098 |
|
EVASION
PENALTY.A taxpayer’s ignorance or
mistake about the amount of penalty the taxpayer incurs by not timely filing
tax returns and remitting collected retail sales tax is not the sort of
ignorance or mistake that overcomes a finding of intent to evade. |
| |
24 WTD 247 |
04-0120 |
|
STATUTE
OF LIMITATIONS – FRAUD – EVASION.The
statute of limitations was tolled by a fraudulent misstatement of fact.An owner of an airplane made a fraudulent
misstatement of fact when it told the Department it had purchased the plane
for resale only, when evidence demonstrated that the plane had been put to
intervening use. |
| |
26 WTD 6 |
05-0139 |
|
MISREPRESENTATION
– ASSESSMENT OF ADDITIONAL TAX.DOR is
not time-barred from amending an assessment due to the taxpayer’s
misrepresentation of a material fact. |
| OTHER: | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|