Our Tumwater office moved. Visit us at our new location.
Nuestra oficina en Tumwater se ha mudado. Visítenos en nuestra nueva ubicación.
Our Tumwater office moved. Visit us at our new location.
Nuestra oficina en Tumwater se ha mudado. Visítenos en nuestra nueva ubicación.
The primary purpose of a levy audit by the Department of Revenue (Department) is to assist the county assessor in successfully performing the duties associated with levying taxes for the districts within the county.
An effective audit of levy calculations consists of gathering information from the assessor’s office to determine the level of compliance with laws and rules, the accuracy of levy calculations, and the effectiveness of record keeping.
The Department calculated the levy limits and levy rate for several of the taxing districts for the 2013 tax year. To determine whether an error occurred, the Department compared the amount levied for the district with the levy limit, the statutory rate limit, the amount authorized by each district’s resolution, and the levy amount certified by the district.
Below is the information that the Department reviewed for the 2013 tax year.
The scope of the audit did not include the review of earmarked funds.
Below are the taxing districts that the Department reviewed for the 2013 tax year:
This report contains the results of the Department’s audit of Franklin County’s Assessor (Assessor) levy calculations for the 2013 tax year.
The objectives of the audit are to assist the Assessor in the levy process, to ensure that taxing districts levy the correct amount of property tax revenues, and to ensure that limits have not been exceeded.
The following items were discovered in the Department’s audit:
The Department has completed its review and grouped the results into two categories:
The Department based the requirements and recommendations contained in this report on our review of the administrative procedures employed, existing state statutes and regulations, and areas we saw opportunities to improve processes, procedures, and communication.
The Department identified three requirements and one recommendation directed towards improving the Assessor’s methods.
The items identified may be specific to the Assessor’s duties, the taxing district duties, county legislative authority duties, or they may have shared components of responsibility. We have listed a summary of these items below.
The Department identified three procedures that the Assessor, taxing district, or county legislative authority must change to comply with the law.
The Department identified one recommendation to improve the accuracy of the levy process.
The Assessor is required to certify the completed tax roll to the Treasurer on or before January 15. (RCW 84.52.080 (4))
The county assessor must deliver the tax rolls to the county treasurer, on or before the fifteenth day of January, taking a receipt from the treasurer. At the same time, the county assessor must provide the county auditor with an abstract of the tax rolls showing the total amount of taxes collectible in each of the taxing districts.
The tax roll prepared by the assessor’s office contains both real and personal property values, the amount of taxes levied, and the levy rates.
The Assessor certified the tax roll to the Treasurer on January 28, 2013. The tax roll was certified to the Treasurer after the statutory due date.
During the levy review, the Assessor explained that he could not certify the tax roll by the statutory deadline due to delays in receiving final levy rates from two joint taxing districts.
The Assessor must take the following actions:
State law gives dates by which the assessor’s office is expected to complete different tasks. If they are missed by a substantial amount of time, it adversely affects the property tax process and the other departments and entities that rely on the Assessor’s work.
The Assessor is required to correct Fire Protection District No. 3’s levy error in the succeeding year by reducing the taxing district’s 2013 levy for the 2014 tax year. (RCW 84.52.085)
When a levy error is discovered that affects all taxpayers within a taxing district, RCW 84.52.085 requires the assessor to correct the error in the following year. If the amount of the adjustment causes a hardship for the taxing district or taxpayers within the district, the adjustment may be made on a proportional basis.
The Assessor levied more than was lawfully allowed for this district.
Prior to the levy audit, the Assessor discovered they had levied an additional $82,000 for non-voted bond debt when the district had already included these funds in their levy request of $1,100,000.
| Assessed Value | Levy Amount | Levy Rate |
|---|---|---|
| $1,017,079,659 | $1,047,405 | $1.029816 |
| $1,017,079,659 | $82,000 | $0.080623 |
| Total | $1,129,405 | $1.110439 |
Listed below are the Department’s levy limit calculations for Fire Protection District No. 3:
The fire district’s levy should have been $1,047,345, rather than $1,129,405, a difference of $82,060.
In addition, during the levy process we discovered that the Assessor used an incorrect levy rate to increase the regular property tax levy limit. The Assessor’s levy computation worksheet lists $1.03809 as last year’s levy, rather than 1.035809, resulting in an additional overlevy of $60.
The Assessor must take the following actions:
To ensure that the taxpayers pay the correct amount of property taxes so that the taxpayers and taxing district are not harmed.
The county legislative authority is required to certify to the Assessor the amount to be levied for each of the taxing districts. (RCW 84.52.070)
Most taxing districts that intend to levy a property tax are required to certify an amount to levy to the county legislative authority. (RCW 84.52.020)
RCW 84.52.020 requires most taxing districts to certify a budget or a budget estimate to the county legislative authority on or before November 30 for levying taxes.
RCW 84.52.070 requires that the county legislative authority certify the amount to be levied for each of the taxing districts, including the county, to the county assessor on or before November 30 of each year. Unless the assessor failed to certify assessed values to taxing districts at least twelve working days prior to November 30.
According to RCW 36.40.071, the county legislative authority may meet on the first Monday in December for a budget hearing.
The Assessor receives a copy of each district’s budget from either the taxing district, Franklin County Auditor, or Treasurer. These budgets were made available to the Department for the audit.
The county legislative authority did not certify the amounts levied by the board of each taxing district within Franklin County to the Assessor.
In addition, on January 7, 2013, the Franklin County Treasurer certified the total obligation bond payment $82,000, for the Franklin County Fire Protection District No. 3. This amount was already included in the fire district’s levy certification, thus a levy error occurred which requires a correction.
The Assessor must take the following actions:
If the taxing districts continue to provide the budget or budget estimate to an entity other than the county legislative authority, the Assessor could provide the county legislative authority with a copy of those documents. The county legislative authority would then have the documentation needed to certify the levy requests to the Assessor as required by statute.
We discussed this requirement with the Assessor and he assured us that they would implement this requirement in the subsequent levy year.
To enhance the transparency in the governmental process of levying property tax.
The Department recommends that the Assessor truncate the levy rate for regular levies, rather than round levy rates.
The Assessor’s mainframe computer system only allows the levy rate to extend out six digits past the decimal. During the levy review we discovered that some of the taxing district’s levy rates were rounded up at the sixth decimal, rather than truncating.
The Department recommends the Assessor take the following actions:
To ensure that the levy rate results in the final levy amount at or below the statutory levy limit for each taxing district.
Regular property tax levies are generally considered those levies that are subject to several statutory limitations. The Assessor must adhere to the following statutory limitations:
The amount of regular property taxes that can be levied by a taxing district, other than the state, is limited to an amount that will not exceed the amount resulting from the following calculation:
The limit factors used in calculating the levy limit are defined in RCW 84.55.005 and WAC 458-19-005.
| If the district's population is... | Then the limit factor is... |
|---|---|
| less than 10,000 | 101% |
| greater than 10,000 - finding of substantial need | lesser of the substantial need factor or 101% |
| for all other taxing districts | lesser of 101% or 100% plus inflation |
Reference:
The statutory rate limit varies by district. These limits are found in the various statutes for each type of district. The Property Tax Levies Operation Manual also provides the statutory maximum rate for each type of district. The levy amount for each district cannot exceed the statutory maximum rate. The statutory dollar rate limits for senior taxing districts can be found in RCW 84.52.043 (1) and in the levy manual, chapter 3.
Reference:
The amount authorized by a district in its resolution or ordinance is another limitation on taxation.
Reference:
Taxing districts that wish to levy must certify a budget or budget estimate to the county legislative authority by November 30 of the assessment year. (Note: this does not apply if the assessor has not certified assessed values to the taxing district at least twelve working days prior to November 30).
The county legislative authority must certify the amount to levy for each of the taxing districts, including the county, to the county assessor on or before November 30 of each year. However, the county legislative authority may elect to conduct its budget hearing on the first Monday in December, as permitted by RCW 36.40.071.
Reference:
The $5.90 limit applies to the total of most regular levies in each tax code area. The aggregate of the junior and senior taxing districts (excluding the state levy and a few others) cannot exceed $5.90 per $1,000 of assessed value. RCW 84.52.010 provides the order in which taxing districts rates are to be prorated, in the order to bring the aggregate rate down to $5.90. The $5.90 limitation does not apply to levies made by or for:
Reference:
The 1 percent Constitutional limit is based on true and fair value, unlike the $5.90 limit, which is based on assessed value. In 1972, a Constitutional limit of 1 percent was adopted by the voters. This limits the amount of property taxes that may be imposed on an individual parcel (real or personal) of property without voter approval of 1 percent of its true and fair value. The 1 percent limit applies to all regular levies (except port and PUD levies). It does not apply to excess levies approved by the voters.
Reference:
There are two types of refunds:
Use this table to decide how to levy for a refund.
| If the refund is a... | Then... | And... |
|---|---|---|
| adjudicated refund (court ordered) | the district is required to levy the refund | the refund is added to the district’s levy. |
| administrative refund | the refund levy is optional | the refund may be added to the levy only if the district requests the refund in its levy certification or budget. |
Note: When adding a refund to the levy, the statutory rate limit cannot be exceeded.
Reference:
Excess levies are over and above the regular property tax levies.
This table lists types of excess levies:
| Type of Levy | Taxing District | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Bond | Most districts | Long term debt usually 15 – 20 years |
| Maintenance & Operation (M&O) | School and Fire Districts | 2 – 4 years |
| General | Most districts except school and fire districts | 1 year |
| Technology | School | 2 – 6 years |
| Transportation Vehicle | School | 2 years |
| Construction/Modernization/Remodeling | School and Fire Districts | 2 – 6 years |
Reference:
Timber assessed value is used both to determine each taxing district’s share of the timber excise tax revenue and in setting property tax levy rates. It serves as a substitute for the value that would be carried on the assessment roll if timber was taxable as real property for all bond and excess levy calculations.
Based on taxes levied, acreage and assessed value of property in the Designated Forest Land Program (DFL) from the prior tax year, and the estimated public acreage available for timber harvesting (RCW 84.33.089), the Assessor calculates the following values:
Once these calculations have been made, the Assessor has all the information necessary to complete the Timber Tax Distribution Priority 1, 2, and 3 worksheets. The priority worksheets list the individual taxing district’s TAV that is to be added to the district’s taxable value for levy calculations.
The assessor should ensure that the appropriate amount of TAV is included in the tax base for calculating excess levies.
| If the levy type is... | Then use this percentage of TAV in the tax base... |
|---|---|
| Bond | 100% |
| Capital Project | 100% |
| Transportation Vehicle | 100% |
| School M&O | 50% of TAV or 80% of the 1983 timber roll, whichever is greater |
| All other excess levies | 100% |
Reference:
According to WAC 458-19-010, the assessor generally calculates the property tax levy rate necessary to collect the amount of taxes levied for each district, within the limitations provided by law. Listed below are some of the guidelines for the Assessor based on the taxing district’s adopted documentation.
Use the table below to determine the authorized levy amount given certain situations.
| When the taxing district submits... | Then... |
|---|---|
| a certified budget but no resolution | the district’s levy is the lesser of the following:
|
| a resolution, but no budget or levy certificate | the assessor does not have the statutory authority to levy on behalf of the taxing district. |
| a certified budget and resolution | the district’s levy is the lesser of the following:
|
| neither a certified budget nor a resolution | the assessor does not have the statutory authority to levy on behalf of a taxing district. |